Feng and Frawlik (2015)

Director: Kirt Vocals

Writer: Kirt Vocals

Genre: Mystery/Action/Film Noir/Martial Arts

Plot Outline: Set in San Francisco in the 1950’s, Feng (Chan), a former Shaolin monk turned down-on-his-luck PI is forced to take on a partner, Frawlick (Diesel), an alcoholic, washed up boxer and war vet . The unlikely duo face off against a corrupt police department, Asian crime families, and the occasional psychopath.

Cast:

Jackie Chan - Harold Feng

Vin Diesel – Albert Frawlik.

Tommy Lee Jones – Lt. Sam Callahan

Chow Yun Fat – Mr. Wu

John Travolta – Insp. Mike Gillotti

Josh Holloway – Insp. Kevin Riley

Yunjin Kim – Mrs. Wu

Drew Berrymore – Anna Bullock

Tony Danza – Joe Mangano

Kirt Vocals – “The Man From Chicago”

More

Chapter 1
It was dark. Real dark. So dark that the street lights had to work overtime to light the streets. The street lights and I had a lot in common: tall, skinny, only useful for our top parts, and I too was working overtime to shed some light on the streets. But on this dark night I had to admit to myself that Jimmy “Peg Tooth” Boland was as disappeared as the dinosaurs, and me with only a few fossils and a toothbrush to unearth the truth. The case had led me to a dead end street; a cul de sac marked with a large “no exit” sign. It was cold too; the case and the night.
One week and one day before I was sitting in my second floor office above the bike shop on Whyte, googling a guy named John Bayard. An insurance company had hired me to prove that his disability claim was fraudulent. That’s the kind of work you get if you’re a PI in Edmonton. Nothing terribly glamorous. Insurance companies, collection agencies, suspicious spouses, and concerned parents. But it was my bread and butter so I didn’t mind it. Google was giving me nothing on the guy. I kept getting hits for some Frenchman who wrote a book about not reading books. I found this pretty funny, but not too helpful.
I’ve often considered moving to a larger space. One with two rooms. A room for my office and a room for a reception area and a receptionist. But my student loan payments and the support payments to my ex made the expenses of a new place and an employee impossible. I had also been meaning to install a buzzer and intercom system, but had never quite gotten around to it. The problem I had was with street people wandering in off the street. Drunks, druggies, and panhandlers would often stumble into my office looking for a toilet or a place to rob. Whoopleheads, I call them, like on “Deadwood”. Edmonton’s a lot like “Deadwood” except not quite as interesting. Whoopleheads were a nuisance that wasted my time and left the place smelling awful for hours afterward. I had just about given up on Google when one such nuisance opened my office door and strolled in.
She wore a dirty, blue and pink nylon windbreaker, a dirty white t-shirt, dirty gray sweatpants, and a pair of muddy work boots. She could have been anywhere from thirty to fifty years old. It was hard to tell. Her face was leathery and saggy and covered in sores or pimples. Her teeth would have made a corpse puke. Her hair would have made a rat reconsider its nesting options. She looked around the office through bloodshot eyes and pulled a skeptical face.
I made shooing motions with my hands. “There’s no bathroom and no money on the premises,” I said tiredly. “Take a hike.”
“Is this the PI office?” she said.
“You’re looking for the EI office. It’s not here,” I said, gesturing again towards the door.
“No. I’m lookin’ for the private investigator. Sam Raymond Investigations. Where is it?”
“This is it.”
She made that skeptical face again. “This is it? Are you Raymond?”
“Yes.”
“You don’t look like a PI.”
“You don’t look like a client. What were you expecting? Tom Selleck?”
“I don’t know. Anyways, I need to hire you. My old man is missing. I want you to find him.”
“I do charge a substantial daily fee, you know.”
She pulled a freezer bag full of coins and a dirty wad of bills out of her fanny pack.
“I’ll pay you fifty bucks and as many blowjobs as you want,” she said nonchalantly. “I’d offer you screws too but my plumbin’s all fucked up.”

I did the hand waving thing again and tried to get the images out of my head. “I only accept cash or credit cards. And it’s more than fifty bucks a day,” I said, trying not to gag.

She sat down in the chair on the other side of my desk before I could stop her. “Well, what the fuck? You don’t accept fair trade? Jesus Christ. How about you call it charity work? Then you can claim it on your taxes or something.”

“That would have to be a certified charitable organization. I don’t think you qualify.”

She stuffed her money back in her pack angrily. “You’re an asshole,” she announced, and got up and slammed out of the office.

I sighed heavily and then regreted it because of the resulting inhalation. She left a wicked hum behind her which I will not attempt to describe because I don’t want to recall it that clearly. I lit a cigarette, hoping that it would cover the stench (I’m not suposed to smoke in my office but I do anyway. Let them fine me). The cigarette didn’t help so I pulled a can of air freshener out of my desk drawer and sprayed the room liberally. Then I found the Yellow Pages and looked for someone to install a buzzer system.

The intercom system cost me an arm and a leg and a few fingers and toes, but the guy showed up that afternoon, which is really good service for this city. He was a nice guy. We chatted while he worked. He was from Ghana but he spoke beautiful English. He told me he was a doctor back home. It doesn’t even surprise me anymore. I don’t even know how many university educated waiters, plumbers, and taxi drivers I’ve run into. And they’re not always foreigners. He worked quickly and efficiently and he seemed to do a good job. He showed me how to work it, and then wished me a good day and left. I was pretty pleased with the new set up so I celebrated with a cigarette. I surfed the web for a bit and then decided to call it a day. John Bayard could wait until tomorrow.

I was just about out the door when the buzzer lost its cherry.

Dreams are not always good sources of inspiration.  Very soon after beginning work on the novel mentioned in the previous posts, I realized that neither Hemingway nor Joyce nor Stein would make very good detectives.  They all led very mandarin lifestyles, each in their own way. Hemingway ’s boyish admiration for men in uniform would have made him more likely to leave a murder investigation to the Paris police. Joyce was going blind and Stein  rarely left her salon, so the idea of these two tromping around Paris trying to solve a murder is ridiculous.  There’s also just way too much research involved. I would have to immerse myself in the time and place with about six months of solid reading before I could even begin to start writing. I don’t have that kind of time to invest in a project that ultimately would be, as I said initially, absurd.

I’m sorry if I’ve disappointed anyone (I doubt that I have).  I’m going to think about serializing one of the other projects I’ve been working on instead. I also want to keep at the essay idea. Any suggestions for topics?

 Once again, a silly idea has taken root in my thoughts and has begun to suggest itself as a feasible project. I am speaking about the Hemingway/Joyce/Stein mystery that my subconscious (or is it unconscious?) mind presented to me the other night. It poses an interesting challenge: not only will I have to devise all of the intricacies of a compelling murder mystery, but I will also have to emulate the style and voice of three very famous, very different writers. This is not just a question of ability but also of legality. How long does someone have to be dead before you can use them in this way? I don’t want descendants and executors descending on me and legally executing me. Does the “this is all made up” disclaimer at the beginning cover your bases?

I’ve also been thinking about this blog as a sort of vanity press. I’ve been considering serializing this novel here on my blog. I’m extremely good at coming up with ideas and beginning to develop them but I have yet to complete an entire project. This has been a real hindrance in aspirations of publication. I’m thinking that serialization will provide me not only with immediate feedback from impartial (or even partial) readers, but it may also encourage me to get the damn thing done so as not to let people down. I tend to work very well under pressure. Deadlines and demands are good for me. I’m not sure about the wisdom of this, though. Will it hurt or help my chances of future publication? Will there be royalty and copyright issues down the road? WordPress terms of service are somewhat vague.  I would appreciate any thoughts, advice, or information on this. In the meantime, I’ll keep mulling it over.

This came to me in a dream: I am going to write a mystery set in Paris in the 1920s. Ernest Hemingway, James Joyce, and Gertrude Stein must solve a murder. It will be written from their perspectives in their styles. It will be absurd. However, it will be critically well received. At least one critic will call it a “tour de force”. It will be made into a movie starring Luke Wilson as Hemingway, Ben Affleck as Joyce, and Demi Moore as Stein. It will be an unwatchable mess but Demi will win a Golden Globe for her portrayal and Affleck will be nominated (even though he looks nothing like Joyce and his accent will be vaguely Scottish instead of Irish throughout the film). I will feel cheap and whorish, but I will use my money and connections to do bigger better things. You just wait and see.

Zoological. Apparently, this expression pre-dates the racist slur. It’s talking about actual raccoons. Unless you ask an Australian. They say it is racist. Who listens to Australians, though?

This one is fairly simple. It comes from Matthew 25.33: “He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.” He is Christ, the sheep are the righteous (as usual), and the goats are the damned in this parable. Those biblical characters were real sheep lovers. I will testify that I prefer the company of goats over sheep. The goat is a resourceful, intelligent beast with a companionable personality. Sheep are stupid, interchangeable, and they smell terrible. Contrary to popular belief, a goat smells quite pleasant. At some point, some other champion of the goat must have felt that Jesus’ parable was slightly unfair. Therefore (and undeniably), “Jesus Persecuting Nanny Goats” means, “I do not care for, or agree with, this situation that is happening here.” In other words, “Hey, Jesus! Leave them kids alone!”

Next topic: “A Coon’s Age”: Racist or Zoological Origins?

There is no scriptural evidence to explain this expression. Not in the gospels, at least. The mysterious middle initial makes no sense. If the convention of a middle name existed in Christ’s time, his middle name would have been the patronymic “Son of Joseph” (Ben Josef, I believe). As far as the Lord’s hairline goes, any Christian knows that Christ had a wonderful head of golden brown (or possibly blond) hair.

It seems fairly clear that this expression (as did all of these expressions) arose from a culture that was less accepting of blasphemy. Taking the Lord’s name in vain was often more offensive than a scatological profanity. It was certainly deemed a sin. Perhaps by inserting “H. Baldheaded” the speaker hoped to a) separate the Jesus from the Christ and thus lessen the power of the blasphemy or b) literally separate the Jesus from the Christ by suggesting that the person being referenced was not the divine Christ but an impostor of some sort. In essence implying, “I’m not talking about that Jesus Christ.” (See also “Jesus Murphy”).
If we agree that b) is the more likely explanation, as it seems a safer tactic in avoiding, if not the actuality of sin, at least the appearance of sin, we can look to three possible sources for the “H. Baldheaded” construction. The first explanation lies in low-level antisemitism. The second is related to the first and lies in Leviticus. The third can be found in the rise of Rastafarianism in the early part of the last century and also has connections to Leviticus.
The H in “Jesus H. Baldheaded Christ” could stand for Hiram or Herschel or some other supposedly Jewish name. The “Baldheaded” could have arisen from a popular belief (or joke) among Christians that Jews kept their heads covered to hide their baldness. The user of this expression implies that he or she is talking about some Jew who happens to have the same first and last name as the Lord (not knowing, of course, that Christ is not a proper surname but a title).
Similarly, the expression could either identify this other Jesus as explicitly non-Jewish, or it could be an emphatic assertion of Christ’s rejection of Judaism. Leviticus 21.5 instructs, “Priests must not shave their heads”. Christians have generally not followed this particular biblical law (although they often quote Leviticus when it suits their needs). Not only is this Jesus Christ not the Christ he is also not even Jewish (there may also be some allusion here to circumcision). Conversely, the expression may emphasize Christ’s rejection of the laws followed by the Jewish priests who handed him over for execution (a popular Christian conceit, not my own). This seems an unlikely explanation as it would not avoid blasphemy and the phrase is hardly ever used in such a devout context.
This expression may also have arisen as a response to the Rastafari belief that the Emperor of Ethiopia is Jah Rastafari, God incarnate, or Christ returned. Again suggesting that the Christ being mentioned is not Jesus Christ but this other “false” Christ. The H would stand for Haile Selassie I (the emperor’s name) and the Baldheaded would refer to the Emperor’s receding hairline. It is equally likely that this expression arose from the Rastafari movement itself and was later co-opted by white Christian society. The dreadlocks worn by Rasta are not an affectation but a form of devotion taken directly from Leviticus 21.5. Non-believers are referred to as “baldheads”. Thus, Jesus H. Baldheaded Christ would be a reference to the perverted, white, Christian conception of Jesus, as opposed to the true Jah. It seems reasonable to believe that the culture that gave us reggae would insert the H as a flourish that would improve the rhythmic qualities of the expression. At any rate, this is an area that requires further research as it would have to be established that this expression was not in popular use prior to the 1930’s when the Rastafari movement began.
Next week: “Jesus Persecuting Nanny Goats!”
**** It has been pointed out to me that Christ’s title IHS might explain the H initial. ****

PART 1

“Jumpin’ Jesus on a Pogo Stick”

This exclamation is a more extreme form of the familiar “Jumpin’ Jesus”, “Jumpin’ Jehoshaphat”, or “Jumped Up Jesus”.  I have studied the canonical gospels and I can find no reference to Christ using a pogo stick or anything like a pogo stick. The only modes of transportation mentioned in the gospels, in relation to Jesus, are a boat and a donkey. It is safe to assume that he also rode a camel at some point in his life but there are no direct references to this in the scriptures. Does this mean that there were no camels and that Christ did not ride them? Certainly not. Similarly, the lack of scriptural evidence does not exclude the possibility that the Lord rode a pogo stick or something very similar.

While official history tells us that George Hansburg, an Illinois toy manufacturer, was the first to develop and patent the pogo stick in 1919, Egyptologists have discovered evidence that the ancient Egyptians may have used pogo-type sticks. In the cartouche shown below, there does appear to be a man falling off something that looks much like a pogo stick.

 Man Falling Off Pogo Stick Cartouche

The cartouche dates from the third dynasty during which slapstick comedy rose to a divine art form (We can all agree that nothing could be funnier than a man unsuccessfully riding a pogo stick). It is also safe to assume that the Israelites in bondage in Egypt would have been exposed to this technology and would have brought it back to the Holy Land with them. Testing this theory, and based on the Egyptian evidence, students at Shenkar College of Engineering in Israel have built a primitive pogo stick using only materials that would have been available in biblical times. The pogo stick’s absence from Exodus, or any of the Mosaic texts, is certainly not surprising given the unsuitable desert conditions that would have made the pogo stick impractical. A thorough examination of the apocrypha and gnostic gospels may provide some evidence that Christ did, in fact, jump on a pogo stick.

The more familiar expression, “Jumpin’ Jesus”, or “Jumped Up Jesus”, seems to stem from two sources. The first, and most obvious, source is the assertion in all Christian theology that Christ rose form the dead. He literally jumped up and lived after being executed. However, this explanation seems more closely related to “Jumped Up Jesus” than”Jumpin’ Jesus” or “Jumpin’ Jehoshaphat”.  Why was the Son of God involved in so much jumping? This would seem to stem from a misinterpretation of the assertion that Christ was exorcising in the temple.  Christ was, of course, engaged in casting out demons and not calisthenics. But, the unlettered would not be able to distinguish these similar sounding words and would assume that Christ was exercising in the temple, hence “Jumpin’ Jesus”.

 

Look for Part 2 later this week: “Jesus H. Baldheaded Christ”

When I first journeyed into the blogosphere (is that what they call it?), I wrote an epistolary essay addressing the Canadian government and Canadians in general. I believe my next offering was an essay on autoeroticism (this was in response to a challenge from a small perverted friend of mine).  Since then my blog has devolved into a series of profanity laden rants, Seinfeldian (a word I hope I just coined) “what’s the deal with <blank>?”, and “dear diary” entries. Basically I make a lot of noise without much substance (with the exception, of course, of my warning labels, which I am quite proud of. However, these are a visual presentation and not representative of my writing). I’d like to raise the quality and quantity from here on in. So, I will begin writing a series of proper essays.

I will welcome topics, assignments, challenges, critiques, arguments, and gifts of money and/or food and/or liquor.

The first series: Christ’s Pogo Stick: Scriptural Origins of My Grandfather’s Exclamations 

Part 1: “Jumpin’ Jesus on a Pogo Stick!”